Monday, May 01, 2006

State Transportation & Energy Issues

What can be done to address transportation needs in Minnesota?  How do we provide consistent power to our industries and homes at affordable prices?

These two major business questions were hashed out during a Minnesota Chamber of Commerce breakfast featuring state lawmakers:  Sen. David Senjem (R-Rochester), Sen. Ann Rest (D-New Hope), Rep. Mike Beard (R-Shakopee), and Rep. Paul Thissen (D-Minneapolis).

Transportation
Let's clear out the rush hour parking lot in the metro!  Discussion revolved around interesting ideas for reducing congestion in the Twin Cities metro area, including an outer ring that would route traffic in a wider square around the metro area outside of the 494/694 ring.  Toll roads and hot lanes made it into the discussion as well with the lawmakers in general interested in the toll road option since it works in other states. 

Each of the legislators were in favor of a gas tax ranging from 5-10 cents to help pay for infrastructure. 

Sen. Senjem even brought up his belief that a commuter rail line from Rochester to the Twin Cities may be prudent in the future. 

Rep. Beard cited engineering solutions that merge lanes in a smarter way to reduce traffic problems in the Twin Cities on sections of 494/694 and how this can help as part of the solution. 

Each of the legislators would like to see the Motor Vehicle Sales Tax Constitutional Amendment wording changed a little bit, but all agree that either way this is an amendment that needs to pass in November to send needed money to transportation.

Energy
What do animal waste, wind and nuclear all have in common?  They're electric!  At least capable of producing power. 
Of course these options and coal were all part of the continuing discussion about growing energy options for our state and nation.

According to Rep. Beard, bio mass (burning animal waste for power) is working with almost 100% efficiency in some locations.  Rep. Thissen believes wind needs to be part of the mix and Sen. Senjem wants to wait on an energy policy until a study comes back that would provide detailed information about the options.  This study will be available for the debate in 2007. 

They acknowledged that base power-providing nonstop generation-is an issue.  Transporting coal from the coal basins is a problem that hasn't been fixed with rail lines providing slow and inconsistent service.  Nuclear power was discussed as a very real opportunity.  The issue, they say, with nuclear is that it is a political problem because the perception is that it is very dangerous and bad for the environment. 

 

 

Thursday, April 27, 2006

Talk of the Town-April

Monthly update on Chamber happenings on KRFO AM 1390 and www.Owatonna.org.




MP3 File

Thursday, March 16, 2006

Local Option Sales Tax Proposal

City Administrator Greg Sparks, Mayor Tom Kuntz, Park & Rec Director Jeff McKay and City Council President Bill Thompson explain the proposed 1/2% local option sales tax.


MP3 File

Thursday, February 02, 2006

Rep. Fran Bradley Discusses Health Care Costs

Representative Fran Bradley discusses health care costs in Minnesota.


MP3 File

Governor Pawlenty Unveils Plan in Owatonna

Gov. Pawlenty unveils details about the state transportation plan in Owatonna.


MP3 File

Minnesota Chamber Update From Board Member Bob Randall, Viracon

Bob Randall is a Sales Manager at Viracon and a member of the Minnesota Chamber Board of Directors.  These updates are from his perspective, please feel free to go to www.mnchamber.com for official policy statements from the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce.

The Minnesota Chamber is staking its entire effort this year on passing the Motor Vehicle Sales Tax (MVST) constitutional amendment after having failed to get more transportation funding for the past four years. Failing to pass the MVST Amendment would certainly set us back in the eyes of the legislature and governor's office as they would say, "the public has spoken...they did not want any more money to go for transportation...this even when the proposal involved only a shift in existing revenues...in essence the proposal involves more funding and NO
TAX INCREASES."

We tabled Eminent Domain until our next meeting in April... members are split between the strict property rights point of view and the pro-growth faction that like having eminent domain as an economic development option. I personally favor limited usage, but not a strict interpretation precluding it from an economic standpoint 100%. Hopefully by April we will have some ideas on how to craft a policy "in the middle".

We decided Energy would be our next big policy effort. The Chamber
staff will spend most of their research resources on this issue this
year as we try to come out with a proactive policy supporting more power
generation to keep rates competitive...if we do nothing,
proposals unfriendly to business will likely put us on the defensive down the road.

Workforce development will be a future issue we deal with as well . We are struggling to
get our arms around this monster! Some want to tackle the issue
"soup to nuts" (education through worker training and recruitment) while
some of us would like more time to define what it is we need. The MN Chamber staff
will work on coming up with some way to measure/research the issue and
present the options to us before we move ahead.

The MN Chamber will be leaping into the debate regarding election reform
as we advocate: 1) staggered terms for the MN Senate 2) moving up the
primaries to June (as a way to minimize the caucuses and encourage more
"mainstream" candidates) 3) having a biennial legislature...having them
meet every other year rather than every year so as to discourage the
idea of having our legislators be full time politicians and 4)drawing
district lines by commission to help de-politicize the process.

We will also be addressing the governor's immigration reform proposal as
it has a provision that is not business-friendly...namely the feature
that opens up a witch hunt for companies that "knowingly hire illegal
immigrants". The issue seems to be more of a Federal problem, rather
than a state problem. We don't have a policy yet, but clearly this is
not fair to businesses that try to comply with Federal Employment law,
which limits the questions and verification we can do to verify citizenship. Having the state put more responsibility on business to verify citizenship while the Federal Gov't ties our hands makes no
sense in my opinion , so I am sure we will have something by April on this issue.

We sharpened up our education, healthcare, environmental, labor/mgmt,
civil justice and privacy policies as well. More on that if you want an
update on anything specific.